Termination advice letters and AI confidentiality: what advising an employer on a dismissal gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.
Advising an employer on a dismissal means holding two sets of secrets: the client’s plan, and a named worker’s personal details, often including his health and his union. The letter is long and has to get the entitlements right, so staff paste it into ChatGPT or Claude to check the arithmetic and tighten the risk section. This page marks every item in a termination advice letter that rule 9, privilege and the Privacy Act bear on, and shows how the same letter is drafted on Ermos inside the firm, from the file and the contract without any of it leaving the building.
The termination advice letter
Sent to the employer after an investigation and before it decides whether and how to dismiss, and relied on when the dismissal is later challenged.
Carrick Doyle Lawyers
Privileged and confidential · 27 October 2026
Ms Rhonda Mullins, General Manager, Pacific Rim Fabrication Pty Ltd1
By email
Re: Mr Brendan Tsakiris: proposed termination of employment2
Dear Rhonda,
Background. Mr Tsakiris, born 8 March 1979, has been Production Supervisor since 11 March 2019 on a base salary of $98,500. He has no prior warnings.2
The allegation. Your investigation report of 20 October finds that on 2 and 9 October he removed offcuts of 10mm marine-grade plate (about 410 kg, replacement value about $3,800) from the yard and sold them to a scrap dealer in Marrickville. He admits taking them. He says the previous supervisor allowed staff to take scrap. There is no written authority either way.3
Two complications. On 9 October he lodged a workers compensation claim for a right shoulder injury he says occurred on 22 September. His physiotherapist, Mr David Chin, has reported that he is fit for suitable duties.4 He is a union member, and his delegate attended the show-cause meeting on 21 October.5
Notice. Under the National Employment Standards an employee with more than five years’ service is owed four weeks’ notice, or payment instead, and one more week if he is over 45 and has at least two years’ service. Notice is not owed if the employee is dismissed for serious misconduct. Redundancy pay does not arise on a dismissal for conduct.6 If you dismiss with payment in lieu, the five weeks come to about $9,471 on his base salary alone.9
Risk. The finding is sound on his admission. But a dismissal now would come less than three weeks after the compensation claim, and that timing invites a general protections claim. An unfair dismissal application would test whether dismissal was a proportionate response after seven years’ clean service. We assess the risk of an adverse finding as moderate.7
The Tarrangower proceedings. Mr Tsakiris was responsible for the weld inspection sheets for the Tarrangower brackets and is a likely witness in Pacific Rim v Tarrangower Marine. An acrimonious dismissal could affect how willing he is to help.8
Recommendation. Dismiss with payment in lieu of notice, to remove the serious misconduct argument, and offer a deed of release of up to $18,000 on top. Do not go above $25,000 without further instructions.9
Hamish Reid10
Solicitor, for Eleanor Vance, Partner10
An invented letter. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.
What leaves the firm
- 1The client contact
A named manager at a named company who is about to dismiss someone. Information confidential to the client under rule 9, and a fact the client does not want known before the worker is told. Rule 9 confidentiality guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted to the provider, generally offshore on personal plans Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 2The worker, his date of birth and his pay
A named employee with a date of birth, a role, a start date and a salary. Personal information about an identifiable individual who has no idea his employer has instructed solicitors. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A worker’s personal details transmitted before he has been told Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 3The allegation and his admission
An account of what the worker is said to have done, what he admits and what he says. Material gathered by the client for the purpose of obtaining advice, and an allegation about a named person. Legal privilege guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Privileged material and an allegation transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 4A workers compensation claim and an injury
A claim, an injured shoulder and a treating physiotherapist. Health information is sensitive information under the Privacy Act, which applies to a law practice only if the practice is covered. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Sensitive health information transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 5Union membership
That the worker is a union member and who attended his meeting. Membership of a trade union is also on the Privacy Act’s list of sensitive information. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Sensitive information about union membership transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 6The notice rules
The minimum notice table and the exceptions as the National Employment Standards state them. Public information that names no one.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Public rule with no client or worker in it; nothing to expose Ermos Edge A person must still check the weeks against the award or contract Ermos Dominion A person must still check the weeks against the award or contract - 7The firm’s assessment of the risk
Where the client is exposed and the firm’s view of how badly. The core of privileged advice, and what the worker’s lawyer would most like to read. Legal privilege guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Your assessment of the risk transmitted; on consumer tiers it can train future models Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 8The link to the client’s own litigation
That the worker is a likely witness in a separate proceeding, and the concern that the dismissal could affect his cooperation. Two matters connected in one paragraph of strategy. Legal privilege guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Strategy across two matters transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 9The payment and the ceiling
The notice payment for this worker, and the amounts the client may pay to end the dispute. The client’s negotiating position, written before any negotiation. Legal privilege guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The payment and the ceiling transmitted before any negotiation Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 10The solicitors
Ties the advice to practitioners bound by rule 9 and supervised by a partner. Supervising AI guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted, and the leak is traceable to you Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office
What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)
- The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
- On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
- The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
- Once sent, the firm no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.
The same document on Ermos
Ermos Dominion
The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the matter file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.
Ermos Edge
Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.
| Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) | Ermos Edge | Ermos Dominion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the document is processed | Provider servers, generally offshore on personal plans | Your instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in Australia | The unit in your office |
| Who can read it | Provider staff and systems, under policy | Your staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothing | Your staff only |
| Is it kept | On the provider’s terms | Kept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining it | Stays on the unit |
| Can it train a model | On consumer tiers, yes | No, by contract | Only your own unit learns from it, on your hardware |
Part of AI data leakage in law firms. See how this works in practice: Legal research on Ermos.
Common questions
Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a termination advice letter?
Can we use ChatGPT or Claude for a termination advice letter if we remove the worker's name?
Does a ChatGPT Business or Claude Team plan make it safe for a termination advice letter?
How can a law firm use AI for a termination advice letter without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
How much notice must an employer give when it dismisses an employee?
Is union membership personal information that needs extra care?
How is a termination advice letter drafted on Ermos?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo