AI for law firms: client files never leave the building.
Your lawyers already know what AI can do; many of them are quietly using it. The problem was never capability. It is that a firm's stock in trade is privileged, confidential material, and the standard AI tools all work by transmitting that material to someone else's infrastructure. An Ermos AI unit lives in your office, so the capability arrives and the client files never leave. Our current unit is Dominion.
What your team does with it
Upload an agreement and ask what is unusual against your own precedents: notice periods, indemnities, missing clauses, defined-term inconsistencies.
Condense large document sets into chronologies and issue summaries your team verifies, instead of reading cold.
First drafts of advices, letters and standard documents in your house style, drawing on your own precedent bank rather than the open internet.
Reconstruct the timeline across correspondence, file notes and drafts on a matter, with each event traceable to its source document.
Client updates and routine correspondence drafted from the file, ready for review rather than from scratch.
Ask what the firm has previously advised on a point and get answers grounded in your own archive, with citations to the documents.
The compliance frame, plainly
Two obligations do the work here. Legal professional privilege protects confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of legal advice or litigation; the live question modern AI raises is whether routing client material through a third-party service sits comfortably with the confidentiality that privilege depends on. And rule 9 of the Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules binds practitioners to client confidentiality subject to narrow exceptions. Neither rule says "no AI". Both make the deployment posture the question that matters: with a no-egress unit, there is no transmission to a third party to analyse, because there is no transmission at all. For firms that run entirely in the cloud with no file server, Ermos Edge is hosted for you in Australia.
Cloud AI vendors answer with training policies and certifications, and the good ones mean it. Our Claude and ChatGPT Enterprise comparisons set out honestly what those products get right, and why "not trained on" is a different promise from "never left the building".
Built for how a firm actually runs
Your Ermos unit is installed on your network and fully managed: monitoring, model updates and support are included, and ErmosIQ tunes the models to your precedents, your matter types and your house style over time. Partners and staff use it like any modern AI assistant. Nothing requires your IT support beyond a power point and a network port.
The use case library
Process-level guides to running specific workflows on an Ermos unit, each on its own page. We add to this library as clients show us new ways they work.
Chronologies and issue summaries from large document sets, verified by your team.
Read how it works → Drafting submissionsFirst drafts grounded in your precedents, with the court practice notes taken seriously.
Read how it works → Contract reviewClause-level review against your own precedent bank, cited to the documents.
Read how it works → Firm knowledge researchAnswers from decades of your own advices and precedents, with citations.
Read how it works →Dominion is priced per unit, per month on a 12-month term, sized to your practice: unlimited users, no per-user licences, no usage charges. Exact pricing is confirmed in the scoping consultation.
Common questions
Can law firms use ChatGPT for client work?
Does using AI risk waiving privilege?
Will it work with our document management system?
Is a local model good enough for legal work?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo