Renewal declarations and AI: what a client’s disclosures give away in ChatGPT or Claude.
The renewal declaration is where the Insurance Contracts Act lives in a brokerage. For consumer contracts, section 20B requires the insured to take reasonable care not to misrepresent; for business contracts, section 21 imposes the duty of disclosure. The answers on the form are the client’s most sensitive admissions: claims, convictions, insolvency, cancelled policies, changes in the risk. Brokers paste the form into ChatGPT or Claude to check it or to draft the covering note. This page marks every item on a standard declaration and shows how the same check happens on Ermos inside the brokerage.
The renewal declaration
Completed by the client before each renewal, with the broker’s help, to meet the disclosure duties under the Insurance Contracts Act.
Renewal declaration
Harbourline Joinery Pty Ltd1 · Business pack renewal 1 December 2026 · Completed with P. Desai9
| Claims or circumstances in the last 5 years | Yes. Water damage July 2026 ($31,200). Public liability, subcontractor injury March 2026, open. Also: a customer, Coastline Developments, has alleged defective installation on a 2025 project; no claim made yet.2 |
| Any director or principal declared bankrupt, or a director of an insolvent company, in the last 10 years | Yes. Daniel Okafor was a director of Okafor Cabinetry Pty Ltd, which was wound up in 2016 with a deficiency of approximately $140,000 to creditors.3 |
| Any director or principal convicted of a criminal offence, or subject to a regulator’s action | Yes. SafeWork NSW improvement notice March 2026, complied with. Daniel Okafor: drink driving conviction 2019, licence suspended six months.4 |
| Any insurance declined, cancelled or renewal refused | Yes. Workers compensation policy lapsed March 2026 for non-payment, reinstated. Cyber cover declined by Southern Cross Insurance in 2024 after a questionnaire.5 |
| Changes in the business or the risk | Turnover down 13% after loss of largest customer. Two new contracts from January. Dust extraction system flagged by the insurer; thermal imaging booked. Considering adding a spray booth in 2027.6 |
| Declaration | I declare that the answers above are true and complete and that I understand that failure to disclose may entitle the insurer to reduce or refuse a claim or cancel the policy. Signed: D. Okafor, 18 October 2026.7 |
| Broker note | Client initially answered “no” to the insolvency and conviction questions; I prompted him on both after checking our file. The Coastline allegation was added at my suggestion as a circumstance. Discussed section 21 and the consequences of non-disclosure.8 |
An invented declaration. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.
What leaves the brokerage
- 1The client
Named. Every admission below is attributed. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted to the provider, generally offshore on personal plans Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 2Claims and a circumstance
Two claims and an allegation of defective work by a named customer that is not yet a claim. Disclosed to the insurer because section 21 requires it; a disclosure about a third party as well.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) An allegation against the client, naming a customer, transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 3A past insolvency
That the director’s previous company was wound up owing creditors. Personal information about a named individual’s financial history, ten years old and still asked about on the form. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A director’s insolvency history transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 4A conviction and a regulator notice
A named person’s criminal record and a safety regulator’s action. Among the most sensitive personal information the Privacy Act contemplates. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A criminal conviction transmitted; on consumer tiers it can train future models Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 5Declined and lapsed cover
That one insurer declined the client and another policy lapsed. Insurance history that follows a client from placement to placement.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Declined and lapsed cover transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 6Changes in the risk
The downturn, the new contracts, an insurer’s concern and a planned change. Commercial information, and the business’s plans.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The business’s plans transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 7The signed declaration
The client’s statement that the answers are complete, with the consequences acknowledged. The document the insurer relies on, and the client’s protection if it is accurate.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The signed declaration transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 8The broker’s note on how the answers were obtained
That the client first answered no, and was prompted. The record that protects the client and the brokerage if non-disclosure is alleged, and the one that would be most damaging to the client if read without its context.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The note that the client first said no, now on a third party’s servers Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 9The broker
Ties the declaration to a named account manager bound by the Code of Practice.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted, and the leak is traceable to you Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office
What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)
- The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
- On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
- The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
- Once sent, the brokerage no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.
The same document on Ermos
Ermos Dominion
The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the client file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.
Ermos Edge
Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.
| Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) | Ermos Edge | Ermos Dominion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the document is processed | Provider servers, generally offshore on personal plans | Your instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in Australia | The unit in your office |
| Who can read it | Provider staff and systems, under policy | Your staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothing | Your staff only |
| Is it kept | On the provider’s terms | Kept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining it | Stays on the unit |
| Can it train a model | On consumer tiers, yes | No, by contract | Only your own unit learns from it, on your hardware |
Part of AI data leakage in insurance brokerages. See how this works in practice: Renewal preparation on Ermos.
Common questions
Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a renewal declaration?
Is it safe to paste a renewal declaration into ChatGPT or Claude?
Can ChatGPT or Claude be trusted to draft a renewal declaration?
How can a brokerage use AI for a renewal declaration without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
What are the disclosure duties under the Insurance Contracts Act?
Why is the broker's note the most sensitive item?
How are declarations checked on Ermos?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo