Workers compensation certificates and AI privacy: what a certificate of capacity gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.
A workers compensation certificate is written for readers outside the practice: the employer, the insurer and often a rehabilitation provider. GPs fill in many of them, the wording matters, and the notes behind them hold far more than the employer should see, which is why the draft is often pasted into ChatGPT or Claude to tidy up. This page marks every item in a routine certificate and the notes beside it, and shows how the same certificate is prepared on Ermos inside the practice.
The workers compensation certificate
Completed by the treating GP after an injured worker is seen, then given to the worker, who passes it to the employer and the insurer. It is updated at each review while the worker recovers.
Wombeyan Street Family Practice
8 Wombeyan Street, Eastwood NSW 2122 · (02) 5550 0161
Workers compensation certificate · Review 4 November 2026
Worker: Shirin Farahani, DOB 2 February 1987, 04xx xxx 6421
Employer and claim: Northgate Cold Storage Pty Ltd, Silverwater. Insurer Harbourline Workers Insurance, claim WC-2026-00817342
Injury. Lower back strain lifting stock on 21 October 2026. Pain radiating to the left leg. MRI 30 October: L5/S1 disc bulge with no nerve compression.3
Capacity. Fit for suitable duties from 5 November to 19 November 2026: four hours a day, no lifting over 5 kg, no repeated bending, may sit or stand as needed.4
Treatment. Physiotherapy twice a week; celecoxib 200 mg daily; review in two weeks.5
GP notes (kept off the certificate): Has had anxiety since 2019, managed with sertraline. Previous back pain in 2021 after a car accident, claim settled.6
Says her supervisor told her she was faking it and that she is afraid of being moved to night shift if she complains. Asked me not to mention this to the employer.7
Rehabilitation provider: Lucas Ferreira, Steadfast Return to Work, 04xx xxx 9058
Dr Theodora Vasilakis, GP, Provider no. 4xxxxxxC9
An invented certificate and notes. The employer, insurer and claim number are fictional; mobile and provider numbers are masked. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.
What leaves the practice
- 1The worker’s name, date of birth and mobile
Identifies the patient and how to reach her. Personal information, held by the practice as health information because it was collected in providing a health service. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted to the provider, generally offshore on personal plans Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 2Employer, insurer and claim number
Ties the patient to her workplace and an open claim. A claim number is a key that unlocks a whole insurer file.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Employer, insurer and an open claim number transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 3The injury and the imaging result
The diagnosis and an MRI finding. Health information is sensitive information under the Privacy Act. Patient data guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Sensitive health information transmitted; on consumer tiers it can train future models Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 4The capacity assessment
What she can and cannot do at work, which decides her hours and pay while she recovers. Patient data guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A capacity assessment transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 5Treatment and medication
A prescription and a treatment plan against a named worker. Patient data guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A prescription against a named worker transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 6Unrelated mental health and claim history
An anxiety diagnosis, an antidepressant and an earlier injury claim. None of it belongs on the certificate, and it is the most damaging thing on the page if it reaches the employer or insurer by another route. Patient data guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Mental health and claim history transmitted, beyond what the certificate needed Ermos Edge Stays on your instance; the GP can keep it out of the excerpts used for the certificate Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 7A workplace conflict told in confidence
An allegation about a named supervisor and a fear of retaliation, with an explicit request that the employer is not told. Good medical practice 4.4 asks doctors to hold this in confidence. Patient data guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) An allegation about a named supervisor transmitted against the patient’s wishes Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 8The rehabilitation provider
A third party involved in the claim, with a direct mobile number.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A third party’s name and mobile transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 9The certifying GP
A register name and a masked provider number, linked here to this claim.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A register name and a masked identifier, tied to the claim Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office
What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)
- The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
- On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
- The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
- Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.
The same document on Ermos
Ermos Dominion
The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the patient record. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.
Ermos Edge
Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.
| Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) | Ermos Edge | Ermos Dominion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the document is processed | Provider servers, generally offshore on personal plans | Your instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in Australia | The unit in your office |
| Who can read it | Provider staff and systems, under policy | Your staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothing | Your staff only |
| Is it kept | On the provider’s terms | Kept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining it | Stays on the unit |
| Can it train a model | On consumer tiers, yes | No, by contract | Only your own unit learns from it, on your hardware |
Part of AI data leakage in general practitioner (GP) practices. See how this works in practice: Certificates and reports on Ermos.
Common questions
Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a workers compensation certificate?
Is it safe to paste a workers compensation certificate into ChatGPT or Claude if we remove the worker's name?
What if a GP uses their own ChatGPT or Claude account to word a workers compensation certificate?
How can a GP use AI for a workers compensation certificate without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
The employer and insurer will see the certificate anyway. What is the risk?
Does a worker's consent to the claim cover an AI tool?
What should a GP leave out of a certificate?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo