GP care plans and AI patient privacy: what a chronic condition care plan gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

A chronic condition care plan is a complete summary of a person’s health in two pages: every condition, every medication, the latest results, what the patient wants to achieve and who is helping them. It is long, repetitive to write and reviewed every few months, which is why GPs and practice nurses paste last year’s plan into ChatGPT or Claude to update it. This page marks every item in a routine care plan that the Privacy Act, Good medical practice and the NSW health records law bear on, and shows how the same plan is drafted on Ermos inside the practice.

The chronic condition care plan

Prepared by the GP, often with the practice nurse, for a patient with one or more chronic conditions, then reviewed at set intervals. Copies go to the patient and to the allied health practitioners named in the plan.

Wombeyan Street Family Practice
8 Wombeyan Street, Eastwood NSW 2122 · (02) 5550 0161

Chronic condition care plan · Review prepared 3 November 2026

Patient:

Conditions.

Current medications.

Recent results.

Patient goals.

Actions.

Care team.

Carer.

· Practice nurse: Mereana Tuck

An invented care plan. The Medicare number is a published test value and the mobile and provider numbers are masked. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the practice

  1. 1
    Name, date of birth, address and Medicare number

    The identifiers that tie the whole plan to one man. The Medicare number is an identifier assigned by a government agency, and APP 9.2 limits when an organisation may use or disclose one. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    Every chronic condition and a recent fall

    A list of diagnoses is health information, which the Privacy Act treats as sensitive information with stricter rules on use and disclosure. Patient data guide.

  3. 3
    The medication list

    Doses that show each condition being treated and a dose reduced for kidney function. Part of the record Good medical practice 10.5 asks a doctor to keep accurate and secure. Patient data guide.

  4. 4
    Pathology results

    Laboratory values against a named patient, with the laboratory and date. Patient data guide.

  5. 5
    Goals and a fear of residential care

    What the patient said about his life and what frightens him. Private detail Good medical practice 4.4 asks doctors and their staff to hold in confidence. Patient data guide.

  6. 6
    The actions, including a driving question

    The GP’s plan for this patient, and a note that his fitness to drive is under discussion. A third party reading it learns something the patient has not yet decided to share.

  7. 7
    The allied health team

    Named practitioners outside the practice. Their names are public, but the plan links them to this patient’s care.

  8. 8
    A named carer with her mobile number

    Personal information about someone who is not the patient, collected because she helps with his medications. Privacy Act guide.

  9. 9
    The consent line

    Records that the patient agreed to the plan going to the named care team. It covers those recipients; an AI provider is a different recipient the patient was never asked about. Patient data guide.

  10. 10
    The GP and practice nurse

    Names on the public register and a masked billing identifier, linked here to this patient’s record.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the patient record. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in general practitioner (GP) practices. See how this works in practice: Care plans on Ermos.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a GP care plan?
Yes, a pasted care plan is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. This plan lists four chronic conditions, a kidney result, seven medicines, a fall, a carer's mobile number and a pending conversation about whether the patient should keep driving.
Is it safe to paste a GP care plan into ChatGPT or Claude if we remove the name?
No, because the rest of the plan still points to one man. Removing names rarely makes a document anonymous. Information stays personal information while the person is reasonably identifiable, and the OAIC warns that information can be at risk of re-identification even when it has been de-identified or anonymised. A widower in Eastwood with kidney disease, a recent fall, a bowling club and a daughter who visits on Sundays is recognisable to anyone who knows him. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks.
Can ChatGPT or Claude be trusted to update a care plan from last year's version?
Not without the GP checking every line. Language models can produce fluent text with details that are not in the source, wrong doses or wrong dates. In this plan the most harmful errors would be a metformin dose that ignores the kidney reduction, a result carried forward from the old plan, or a care team member who has changed. The GP should check each one against the record.
How can a GP use AI for a chronic condition care plan without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. The plan is drafted from the patient record and the practice's own template. The GP settles the goals and actions with the patient and signs the plan.
The allied health team gets the plan anyway. Why does an AI tool matter?
The patient agreed to the plan going to the named care team. APP 6.1 says information collected for one purpose must not be used or disclosed for another unless the patient consents or an APP 6.2 exception applies. An AI provider is a separate recipient the patient was never asked about.
Is a carer's phone number on a care plan covered by privacy law?
Yes. It is personal information about the carer, and because the practice collected it in providing a health service to the patient it is held as health information under section 6FA of the Privacy Act.
What does Ahpra expect if a GP uses AI to draft a care plan?
Ahpra's guidance says the practitioner remains responsible and must apply human judgment to AI output, and should understand where patient data is stored and whether it is used to train the model.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo