Bookkeeper handover notes and AI data leakage: what a staff note gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

When a bookkeeper moves clients to a colleague, the handover note is written fast and holds everything the colleague needs on day one: where the passwords live, which pay run is tricky, what the owner has been told and what he has not. It is tempting to paste it into ChatGPT or Claude to turn it into a clean checklist. This page marks every item in a realistic handover note that APES 110, the TPB Code and the Privacy Act bear on, including the weekly routine that is safe to share, and shows how the same checklist is produced on Ermos inside the practice.

The bookkeeper handover note

Written by a departing team member when clients move to a colleague, and kept on the client files so the new bookkeeper can start without a gap.

Handover note
· 30 October 2026

Access.

Weekly routine.

Harbourline pay.

Daniel’s spending.

The ATO.

Marchetti Dental.

Payments.

Lodging.

An invented note. The phone number is a placeholder. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the firm

  1. 1
    The people, the clients and a phone number

    Names two staff, two clients and a client’s personal number with his preferred call time. Personal information, and the key that ties everything below to real people and real files. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    Where the logins live

    Which password store is used, where a bank token is kept, and who has payroll access. A map of how to get into two clients’ systems. TPB(GS) 55/2026 lists how and where information is stored among the factors a tax practitioner should consider when using AI. TPB Code guide.

  3. 3
    An underpayment and a live employment claim

    An employee’s underpayment, and that another employee has a Fair Work Commission application on foot with the records to be left as they are. Sensitive for both employees, neither of whom is the firm’s client. Privacy Act guide.

  4. 4
    A director’s private spending

    How a director’s personal spending is coded and the journal a reviewer queried. The firm’s handling instruction and a point of exposure for the client. APES 110 confidentiality guide.

  5. 5
    The payment plan and the cash position

    That the client is on a plan, when it starts, that a BAS must not be paid yet and that a lender is watching. The client’s position with two creditors, and an instruction the partner has not yet confirmed with the client. TPB Code guide.

  6. 6
    A family loan and a request that a brother not see it

    The lender, the amount, and an instruction about who in the family may see the ledger. A confidence the firm holds inside a family, and an access control that depends on the instruction being followed. APES 110 confidentiality guide.

  7. 7
    An elderly man’s memory problems

    A health matter about a named individual, recorded to explain who to call. Health information is sensitive information under the Privacy Act, and the Act applies to the firm where it is covered, with stricter rules on handling. Patient data guide.

  8. 8
    The weekly routine

    A generic cycle of reconciliations, payments, pay runs and a balance check, which any practice would write. It names no client, person or figure.

  9. 9
    Authority over a client’s bank account

    The limit on payments the bookkeeper may release. AUSTRAC’s guidance says a bookkeeper processing routine payments on fixed client instructions, without discretion to redirect funds, is less likely to be managing the client’s money for designated service item 3, but the facts decide, and the authority is a security matter as well. TPB Code guide.

  10. 10
    Who lodges

    That the bookkeeper prepares and a registered agent lodges. TPB guidance says BAS services for a fee or other reward generally require registration, and a bookkeeper used by a registered practitioner is providing tax agent services on the practitioner’s behalf. The wording names the agent but otherwise describes an ordinary procedure. TPB Code guide.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the firm no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the client file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in accounting firms. See how this works in practice: Workpaper review on Ermos.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a bookkeeper handover note?
Yes, once the note is pasted or uploaded it goes to the AI company's servers and is processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. This note says where two clients' Xero logins sit, names an employee with a Fair Work Commission application on foot and records that Giuseppe has memory problems.
Is it safe to paste a bookkeeper handover note into ChatGPT or Claude?
No, because the note works as a map into two clients' affairs. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks. The access section says where the Xero logins and a Westpac token sit and who has payroll access. It also records a queried $9,600 journal and an instruction that Marco must not see the loan ledger. Taking names out leaves those facts in place.
What if staff use their own ChatGPT or Claude account for a bookkeeper handover note?
The firm cannot see or manage what was sent from a personal account. On a personal plan the user cannot choose where conversations are stored or processed. Some business plans let an organisation choose to store data at rest in Australia (OpenAI), which still leaves the content with the AI company. Both companies can also review content that is flagged for safety or policy reasons. A departing bookkeeper in a hurry could turn the note into a checklist on a personal account, and the firm would have no record that the logins map, the Fair Work Commission matter or Giuseppe's health had left. The new bookkeeper would inherit a note nobody can account for.
How can an accounting practice use AI for a bookkeeper handover note without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. Ermos drafts the checklist from the client files and the practice's own handover template. A partner checks it and signs it off before the new bookkeeper starts work.
Does a bookkeeper need to be registered?
The Tax Practitioners Board says an individual, company or partnership that provides BAS services for a fee or other reward generally needs to be registered, unless an exemption applies. Where a registered practitioner uses a bookkeeper to help prepare and lodge BAS, those are tax agent services provided on the practitioner's behalf, and the practitioner's obligations apply. The TPB also says an employee or contractor of a registered tax or BAS agent who does not provide tax agent services in their own right does not need to be registered. Check the TPB's current guidance for the facts of each case.
Does AUSTRAC regulate bookkeepers who pay a client's bills?
AUSTRAC's guidance on professional designated services gives an example of a bookkeeper processing routine payments from a client's account under fixed instructions, without discretion to redirect funds. It says such a practice is less likely to be managing the client's money for item 3. Whether a particular arrangement is covered depends on all the facts, and obligations for these services began on 1 July 2026.
Why not keep passwords in the note?
A note tends to be copied, pasted and forwarded, and anyone who gets the text gets the access. TPB(GS) 55/2026 asks tax practitioners to consider how and where information is stored when using AI tools. A password store with individual access controls removes the temptation to put logins in the note, and keeps them out of any prompt.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo