Job order forms and AI data leakage: what a client brief gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

The job order is where a client tells a recruiter what it really wants, and clients say a lot: why the last person left, a restructure that has not been announced, the real budget and the kind of person they would prefer. Consultants paste the form into ChatGPT or Claude to draft the advertisement and the candidate brief. This page marks every item in a routine job order that confidentiality, the Privacy Act or anti-discrimination law touches, and shows how the same advertisement and brief are drafted on Ermos inside the agency, without the client’s brief leaving the building.

The client job order form

Completed on the intake call with a hiring manager, before any search starts. It sits under the terms of business and drives the advertisement, the screening questions and the candidate brief.

Job order
Larkspur Search Partners · Received Monday 5 October 2026

Client and contact
Role
Why vacant
Confidential
Preferences
Do not approach
Budget
TermsAs per Terms of Business signed 1 October 2026.
Consultant

An invented job order. The client, its people and the phone number are fictional. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the agency

  1. 1
    The client and the hiring manager

    A named client and a named manager with a direct number. Commercial confidence between the agency and the client, and personal information about the manager. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    Role, salary band and package

    The client’s intended spend on a hire. Commercial information that shapes every negotiation, and which candidates would pay to see.

  3. 3
    A predecessor who left after a performance process

    A named former employee, the circumstances of their exit and an instruction to conceal them. That person’s personal information, held by an agency that is not their employer; the OAIC says the employee records exemption is unlikely to apply to organisations that provide recruitment services under contract to an employer. Privacy Act guide.

  4. 4
    An unannounced restructure

    A depot consolidation and the number of roles at risk. Highly confidential to the client, and information the agency was told in confidence under the terms of business.

  5. 5
    Age and career-gap preferences

    A written preference for candidates under 45 and for no one with a career gap. The Fair Work Act stops a prospective employer taking adverse action against a prospective employee because of attributes that include age and family or carer’s responsibilities, and the NSW Act has provisions aimed at employment agencies. An instruction like this in writing is evidence for whoever later challenges a hiring decision. Privacy Act guide.

  6. 6
    A do-not-approach list

    Which companies the agency has agreed not to recruit from. Commercial information that also names the client’s relationships with competitors.

  7. 7
    The client’s real ceiling

    A budget above the advertised band, with an instruction to keep it from candidates. The single most valuable number for a negotiator on the other side.

  8. 8
    The consultants

    Ties the form to named staff, so a leak is traceable to the team.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the agency no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the candidate file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in recruitment agencies.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a client job order form?
Yes, everything pasted or uploaded is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. The form carries Northgate's salary band, a budget it can stretch beyond that band and an unannounced depot consolidation with about twelve roles at risk.
Is it safe to paste a client job order form into ChatGPT or Claude if we take the client's name out?
No, because the details still identify Northgate and its people. Removing names rarely makes a document anonymous. Information stays personal information while the person is reasonably identifiable, and the OAIC warns that information can be at risk of re-identification even when it has been de-identified or anonymised. A Finance Manager vacancy at Silverwater, a named predecessor who left after a performance process and a depot closure affecting about twelve roles point to one client. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks.
What if staff use their own ChatGPT or Claude account for a client job order form?
The agency cannot see or manage what a consultant sent from a personal account. On a personal plan the user cannot choose where conversations are stored or processed. Some business plans let an organisation choose to store data at rest in Australia (OpenAI), which still leaves the content with the AI company. Both companies can also review content that is flagged for safety or policy reasons. The client's hidden budget ceiling and the unannounced restructure would sit outside the agency's own records, and the agency could not tell Northgate where its brief went.
How can a recruitment agency use AI for a client job order form without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. Ermos drafts the advertisement and the candidate brief from the job order and the agency's own templates. The consultant checks both and signs them off before they go out.
Can a client tell us it wants someone under 45?
The Fair Work Act lists age among the attributes a prospective employer must not use to refuse to employ someone or to offer different terms, and the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) protects applicants on grounds that include age and has provisions aimed at employment agencies. An agency that records or acts on such an instruction should take advice before doing so.
Is information about the person who left covered by the Privacy Act?
It is personal information about an identifiable individual. The employee records exemption is aimed at an employer's handling of its own employees' records, and the OAIC says it is unlikely to apply to organisations that provide recruitment services under contract to an employer, so an agency should treat what it holds about a former employee as covered if the Act applies to it.
How should an agency treat a client's confidential restructure?
As confidential under the terms of business, because the Privacy Act is about information on individuals and a depot closure is the client's commercial information. Check the confidentiality clause in your terms of business, restrict the form to the consultants on the search, and keep it out of tools you do not control.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo