Candidate CVs and AI data leakage: what a CV and candidate profile give away in ChatGPT or Claude.

A candidate profile is a CV with the agency’s own notes stapled to it, and it is the document recruiters most often paste into ChatGPT or Claude to reformat, summarise or turn into a client-ready submission. It carries a person’s address, birth date, salary, the reason they are leaving, who will vouch for them and sometimes more than they meant to say. This page marks every item in a routine profile that the Privacy Act touches, including the items that are sensitive information, and shows how the same profile is prepared on Ermos inside the agency.

The candidate CV and profile

Created when a candidate registers or is first screened, then updated through the search. The CV part is written by the candidate; the notes, ratings and consent record are the agency’s. It is reformatted and sent to clients, which is where it most often meets an AI tool.

Candidate profile
Larkspur Search Partners · Confidential · Updated 19 October 2026

Name and contact
Born and work rights
ExperienceFinance Manager, Brindlewood Packaging Pty Ltd, April 2022 to present. Pinegrove Foods Pty Ltd, Senior Accountant then Finance Manager, 2016 to 2021.
Achievements
Package and notice
Career break
Community
Referees
Consent
Consultant notes

An invented candidate profile. The phone numbers and email address are placeholders. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the agency

  1. 1
    Name, address and contact details

    A named person at a home address with a mobile number and email. Personal information, and the start of impersonation and phishing. The OAIC says the employee records exemption will not apply to personal information collected about prospective employees, so an agency that is covered by the Act holds this under the APPs. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    Date of birth and work rights

    A birth date and citizenship status. Personal information, and the pair of facts used to verify identity. Age is also an attribute discrimination law treats with care once it reaches a hiring decision. Privacy Act guide.

  3. 3
    Achievements at a named employer

    Figures and an ATO matter at the current employer, written by the candidate. The employer’s confidential business, and the candidate’s own bargaining position.

  4. 4
    Salary, bonus and notice

    What the candidate earns, what she wants and when she can start. Personal information, and the figure a client would pay to know before it makes an offer. Privacy Act guide.

  5. 5
    A career break and her father’s stroke

    A reason for a gap that discloses a third person’s illness. Health information is sensitive information, which the Privacy Act subjects to higher standards of collection, and family or carer’s responsibilities appear in the Fair Work Act list of protected attributes. Patient data guide.

  6. 6
    A parish role

    A volunteer position in a church body, from which religious belief can be inferred. Religious beliefs are on the Privacy Act list of sensitive information, and religion is a protected attribute under the Fair Work Act. Privacy Act guide.

  7. 7
    Referees and their numbers

    Two other people’s names, roles and a mobile number, and a note that the second will be called only after an offer. Their personal information, and a statement about how the job search is being kept from her employer. Privacy Act guide.

  8. 8
    The consent record

    Evidence of what the candidate agreed to, and when. It covers submission to clients; whether it reaches an overseas AI provider is a separate question. Consent also bears on the agency’s own status: under section 6D(7) a small business operator that discloses personal information with the individual’s consent does not lose its small business status for that reason. Privacy Act guide.

  9. 9
    The consultant’s private notes

    A candid opinion, a complaint about the current manager, a competing interview and an instruction about contact. Written to be read by colleagues. If the candidate asks for access, APP 12 requires access unless an exception applies, so notes are written as though she may see them. Privacy Act guide.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the agency no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the candidate file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in recruitment agencies.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a candidate CV and profile?
Yes, everything pasted or uploaded is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. A profile pairs Nina Castellano's home address and birth date with her salary, a career break after her father's stroke and a volunteer role in a parish council.
Is it safe to paste a candidate CV and profile into ChatGPT or Claude if we remove her name?
No, because the rest of the profile still points to one person. Removing names rarely makes a document anonymous. Information stays personal information while the person is reasonably identifiable, and the OAIC warns that information can be at risk of re-identification even when it has been de-identified or anonymised. The birth date, an Enmore street address, a finance manager role at a named employer, a career break to care for her father and a parish treasurer role fit only one candidate. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks.
Can ChatGPT or Claude remember the details in a candidate CV and profile later?
They can. Both products also have memory features that can carry details from one conversation into later ones, and on a personal account each user decides whether they are switched on (ChatGPT, Claude). Consultants reformat one profile after another in the same account. Nina's salary expectation, her career break and the consultant's notes about her manager could follow the user into a later chat about a different candidate. Her recorded consent covers submission to clients, which is a separate question.
How can a recruitment agency use AI for a candidate CV and profile without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. Ermos prepares the client-ready profile from the candidate file and the agency's own submission template. The consultant checks it against the file and signs it off before it goes to a client.
Does the employee records exemption cover the CVs we hold?
The OAIC says the exemption will not apply to the collection of personal information about prospective employees who are subsequently not employed by an organisation, such as unsuccessful job applicants, and that it is unlikely to apply to organisations that provide recruitment services under contract to an employer. A recruiter's candidate database is therefore not protected by it.
Is a church role on a CV sensitive information?
Religious beliefs are on the Privacy Act list of sensitive information, and a volunteer role in a parish body can point to them. Sensitive information is subject to higher standards of collection under APP 3. The practical rule is to record only what the role needs and keep the rest out of the profile.
The candidate agreed to us sending her CV to clients. Does that cover an AI tool?
Not obviously. The OAIC's AI guidance treats entering personal information into a publicly available chatbot as a use and disclosure question under APP 6 and recommends against entering personal information, particularly sensitive information. A consent drafted around client submissions should be read against that before relying on it.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo