Will instruction sheets and AI confidentiality: what the plans for her children give away in ChatGPT or Claude.
A will instruction sheet is the most personal form a law firm completes. It records who the client trusts with her children, what she owns, what she is afraid of and who she wants kept out, usually in her own words, taken down in an hour. Staff paste it into ChatGPT or Claude to turn the notes into drafting instructions or a first draft of the will. This page marks every item in an instruction sheet that rule 9 and the Privacy Act bear on, and shows how the same sheet is turned into a draft on Ermos inside the firm.
The will instruction sheet
Completed by the solicitor in the first meeting with a client who wants a will, and used to draft the will and later to defend it if it is challenged.
Will instruction sheet
Matter SOTO-0421 · interview 30 October 2026, 10.30am, in person · H. Reid9
| Client | Marguerite Elena Soto, 12 Bayview Terrace, Coogee NSW 2034, born 17 May 19861 |
| Children | Isla Lindahl, born 3 February 2018. Theo Lindahl, born 19 August 2020.2 |
| Capacity note | Client reports an anxiety disorder treated with medication and fortnightly psychology (GP: Dr Anand, Coogee Family Practice). No memory or cognitive concerns. Understood the nature and extent of her estate and the people with a claim on it.4 |
| Guardian and executor | Camila Soto (sister) as executor and as guardian of both children. Substitute: Rhiannon Vo (friend). Client does not want Camila shown the draft until it is final.3 |
| Assets | Home at 12 Bayview Terrace, owned solely, valued about $2,100,000, mortgage about $640,000. Superannuation about $412,000 with death cover of $1,100,000. Client is unsure whether a death benefit nomination is in place; to check with the fund.5 |
| Structure | Everything to a trust for the children until each is 25, trustee Camila. Mr Lindahl is not to be a trustee or appointor or to receive any benefit. Parenting proceedings are on foot (file SYC 2026/01184). Solicitor to advise separately on what a will can and cannot do about the children’s care.6 |
| Other | Client expects possible compensation from her claim against Greystone and wants any money recovered held in the same trust.7 |
| Fees | Will and testamentary trust, estimated $1,650 plus GST. Costs disclosure given at interview.8 |
An invented form. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.
What leaves the firm
- 1The client, her address and her date of birth
Enough to identify her and to open accounts in her name. Personal information, and confidential to the client under rule 9. Rule 9 confidentiality guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted to the provider, generally offshore on personal plans Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 2Two children and their dates of birth
Two named minors with dates of birth, and the reason the will exists. Personal information about children. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Two children’s names and dates of birth transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 3Guardian and executor choices
Two named people the client trusts with her children and her estate, in order of preference, and her wish to keep one of them out of the drafting. Their personal information and the client’s most private planning. Rule 9 confidentiality guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Two third parties named and the client’s secret transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 4Health and the capacity note
A diagnosis, medication and a treating doctor, recorded so the will can be defended if its validity is later questioned. Health information is sensitive information under the Privacy Act, which applies to a law practice only if the practice is covered, for example through turnover above $3 million. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Sensitive health information transmitted Ermos Edge Leaves only if the excerpt is inside the question, to a named Australian provider that keeps nothing Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 5Assets, debts and superannuation
A home, a mortgage, super and cover, with values. A map of what the estate holds, useful to a fraudster and to a relative who expects more. Rule 9 confidentiality guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A map of the estate on a third party’s servers Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 6The children’s father, excluded, and a court file number
A named person the client wants kept out of the trust, tied to a family court file. Plans the other parent has not been told about, in a document that sits beside live proceedings. Part XIVB of the Family Law Act, covered on the family law affidavit page, is why identifying people in those proceedings is handled with care. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A family court file and a parent’s exclusion transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 7A claim that has not been decided
That the client expects to recover from her employer and wants the money held for her children. It links two matters, and tells a reader she expects to recover. Part of the client’s privileged instructions. Legal privilege guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Privileged instructions linking two matters transmitted; on consumer tiers it can train future models Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 8The fee estimate
The firm’s price for the work, sent with the client’s name.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Low value alone, but sent with the client’s name Ermos Edge Low value alone; the route changes little Ermos Dominion Low value alone; the route changes little - 9The solicitor
Ties the sheet to a practitioner bound by rule 9. Law Society AI guidance.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Transmitted, and the leak is traceable to you Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office
What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)
- The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
- On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
- The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
- Once sent, the firm no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.
The same document on Ermos
Ermos Dominion
The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the matter file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.
Ermos Edge
Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.
| Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) | Ermos Edge | Ermos Dominion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the document is processed | Provider servers, generally offshore on personal plans | Your instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in Australia | The unit in your office |
| Who can read it | Provider staff and systems, under policy | Your staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothing | Your staff only |
| Is it kept | On the provider’s terms | Kept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining it | Stays on the unit |
| Can it train a model | On consumer tiers, yes | No, by contract | Only your own unit learns from it, on your hardware |
Part of AI data leakage in law firms.
Common questions
Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a will instruction sheet?
Can we use ChatGPT or Claude for a will instruction sheet if we remove the names?
Can ChatGPT or Claude remember the details in a will instruction sheet later?
How can a law firm use AI for a will instruction sheet without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Why is the instruction sheet more sensitive than the will?
Does the Privacy Act cover the information on a will instruction sheet?
How is a will drafted from an instruction sheet on Ermos?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo