Dental sedation consent forms and AI privacy: what a sedation consent gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

A sedation consent form is the document a patient reads and signs before intravenous sedation, and it is the longest and most personal consent a dental practice uses. It asks for the medical history that affects the drugs, the fasting and escort arrangements, the risks in plain English and a declaration about alcohol and other substances. Staff paste forms like this into ChatGPT or Claude to simplify the wording or fill in the next patient’s. This page marks every item in a routine sedation consent that the Privacy Act and the Dental Board’s Code of conduct bear on, and shows how the same form is prepared on Ermos inside the practice.

The sedation consent form

Given to the patient before a sedation appointment and signed in the practice. Section 4.2, item 7 of the Code of conduct asks practitioners to document consent appropriately, including considering written consent for higher-risk procedures.

Consent for intravenous sedation
Tallowwood Dental · Thursday 12 November 2026, 8.30am ·

Patient
Procedure
Your health
Declaration
Before you come
Your escort
Risks
Fee
Signed

An invented consent form. The practice, dentists, patient, GP and clinic are fictional; the phone number is a placeholder. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the practice

  1. 1
    The patient

    A full name, date of birth and home address on a consent form. Personal information under the Privacy Act and health information as it is collected in providing a health service. Patient data guide.

  2. 2
    Health details that drive the sedation plan

    Sleep apnoea, a psychiatric medication, a body measurement and the patient’s GP. Health information is sensitive information under the Privacy Act, and these facts decide how the sedation is done. Patient data guide.

  3. 3
    Fasting and clothing instructions

    Standard pre-sedation instructions. The practice’s template wording for every sedation patient and not about anyone in particular.

  4. 4
    The escort

    A named spouse, her phone number and the commitment that she will stay for 24 hours. A third party’s personal information, collected for the patient’s safety. Privacy Act guide.

  5. 5
    The risks, tailored to this patient

    The standard risks, plus a sentence tying the airway risk to this patient’s sleep apnoea. Section 4.2 of the Code expects patients to be given information in a way they can understand before consent, and this wording is a record of that. Patient data guide.

  6. 6
    The procedure and date

    Which teeth, what type of sedation and when. A clinical decision about a named person. Patient data guide.

  7. 7
    The fee and deposit

    What he is paying and that he has paid. Financial consent information, with a card payment on file. Privacy Act guide.

  8. 8
    Alcohol and drug declaration

    His honest answer about drinking and a promise about the day before. Health information, and the item that the dentist must rely on being true. Patient data guide.

  9. 9
    The signature and witness

    The record that the patient agreed, witnessed by a named employee. Section 4.2 item 7 asks practitioners to document consent appropriately; this is the evidence of it.

  10. 10
    The sedation practitioner

    A named dentist and a qualification. Public information about a registered practitioner, tied to the procedure.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the patient record. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in dental practices.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a sedation consent form?
Yes, a pasted consent form is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. This form names the patient's GP and records his sleep apnoea, sertraline, an alcohol declaration and his wife's phone number as escort.
Is it safe to paste a sedation consent form into ChatGPT or Claude if we remove the patient's name?
No, because the form carries more than a name. Removing names rarely makes a document anonymous. Information stays personal information while the person is reasonably identifiable, and the OAIC warns that information can be at risk of re-identification even when it has been de-identified or anonymised. A date of birth, a Lane Cove address, a named GP, an escort with a phone number and a procedure date of 12 November describe one man. His sleep apnoea, medication and alcohol declaration are health information, which is sensitive information under the Privacy Act. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks.
Can ChatGPT or Claude be trusted to draft a sedation consent form?
Not without a dentist checking every line. Language models can produce fluent text with details that are not in the source, wrong figures, wrong dates or references that look real but are not. On this form the most harmful errors would be wrong fasting times, a missing sleep apnoea risk, a wrong medication instruction, a wrong procedure date or a wrong fee. The sedation dentist should check each item against the patient record before the patient signs.
How can a dental practice use AI for a sedation consent form without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. The form is drafted from the patient record and the practice's own sedation consent template. The sedation dentist checks every health detail and instruction and signs it.
Does the Code require written consent for sedation?
Section 4.2 of the Code of conduct asks practitioners to document consent appropriately, including considering written consent for higher-risk procedures. It does not say that every sedation needs a form of a particular kind. A signed form is the usual way a practice documents that the patient was given the information and agreed.
Can AI explain the risks in simpler words?
It can suggest plainer wording, but the practitioner is responsible for the accuracy of what the patient is told. Ahpra says practitioners must apply human judgment to AI output. For a consent, the dentist has to check every risk statement against the patient's own history before the form is given out.
Is the alcohol declaration treated differently?
It is health information about a named person, and so sensitive information under the Privacy Act. It also has a clinical purpose: it affects the sedation. That is the reason it was collected, and sending it to an AI company is a different purpose that the patient was not told about.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo