Verification of identity forms and AI security: what a VOI record gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

A verification of identity form is the densest page in a conveyancing file. It records who the client is, which documents were sighted, how they were checked and, since the AML/CTF reforms, where the money comes from. Staff paste it into ChatGPT or Claude to tidy the notes or to fill a checklist, and in doing so send identity numbers to a provider the client never agreed to. This page marks every item on a routine VOI record for a NSW purchase that bears on the ARNECC rules, the AML/CTF obligations and the Privacy Act, and shows how the same record is handled on Ermos inside the practice.

The verification of identity form

Completed at the first face-to-face meeting with each client, before the practice acts for them in an electronic conveyancing transaction, and kept on the matter file afterwards.

Verification of identity and client authorisation
Brindle Lane Conveyancing Pty Ltd · Matter 26-0418 · Confidential

Client 1
Identity documents sighted
Client 2
Identity documents sighted
Residential address and contact
Method
Client authorisation
Occupation and income
Source of funds
Customer risk rating
Retention

An invented verification of identity record. The passport, licence and Medicare numbers are placeholders, and the employer is fictional. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the practice

  1. 1
    Full names and dates of birth

    Two identities. Personal information, and with the documents below the material identity theft is built from. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    Identity document numbers and expiry dates

    Passport, driver licence and Medicare numbers. The ARNECC guidance says the Verification of Identity Standard requires copies of identity documents sighted to be retained, so these numbers are on file by design and are exactly what should not travel further.

  3. 3
    Address and contact details

    Where the clients live now, their mobile and email. Enough to contact them while pretending to be the practice. Privacy Act guide.

  4. 4
    The check performed and who performed it

    The evidence that reasonable steps were taken. ARNECC guidance says evidence supporting verification of identity must be kept under rule 6.6 of the Model Participation Rules for at least seven years from lodgement. It is the record that protects the practice if the check is ever questioned.

  5. 5
    The client authorisation

    The clients’ signed permission for the practice to act for them in the transaction. ARNECC guidance lists it among the evidence a subscriber must retain, and it is what someone would need to impersonate to act in their name.

  6. 6
    Occupation and employer

    Where each client works and in what role. Personal information that also shows where each of them is on a weekday. Privacy Act guide.

  7. 7
    Source of funds, including a named third-party gift

    AUSTRAC’s conveyancing starter kit covers source of funds and source of wealth in customer due diligence. The entry names the clients’ parents, whose personal information appears without their involvement. The OAIC says the Privacy Act applies to personal information handled for AML/CTF obligations, even in a small business. Privacy Act guide.

  8. 8
    The customer risk rating

    The practice’s own assessment of the client, with screening results. An AML/CTF compliance record that a human assessed and signed.

  9. 9
    The retention note

    A statement of how long the record is kept. Generic practice wording that identifies no one.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the matter file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in conveyancing practices.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a verification of identity form?
Yes, anything pasted from the form is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. This form records passport, driver licence and Medicare card numbers, two dates of birth and the clients' source of funds.
Is it safe to paste a verification of identity form into ChatGPT or Claude?
No, because the form holds the details a fraudster would need to pass as the client. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks. Identity document numbers, a home address, a mobile number and an email address sit on one page. The source of funds also names the buyers' parents, whose personal information appears without their involvement.
Can I upload a verification of identity form to ChatGPT or Claude instead of pasting it?
An uploaded file leaves the practice as a whole file, which can carry other sheets, hidden columns, comments, tracked changes and file properties as well as the part you meant to share. The OAIC's guidance also tells organisations to review carefully the terms and settings that will apply to their use of any AI product. A form saved from the matter file would bring both clients' identity sections, the authorisation and the customer risk rating with it.
How can a conveyancing practice use AI for a verification of identity form without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. The form is prepared from the client file and the practice's own verification of identity template. The licensed conveyancer checks every entry against the documents sighted and signs the record.
What evidence must a conveyancer keep of a client's identity check?
ARNECC guidance says that under rule 6.6 of the Model Participation Rules a subscriber must keep evidence supporting the transaction for at least seven years from lodgement, including any client authorisation and any evidence supporting verification of identity. The evidence should show either that the Verification of Identity Standard was followed or what steps were taken and why they were reasonable.
Does an AML/CTF identity check replace the ARNECC check?
ARNECC says customer due diligence and know-your-customer processes generally do not automatically satisfy the Verification of Identity Standard, though they may be reasonable steps under rule 6.5.2(b). A subscriber must meet the ARNECC requirements whether or not another identity regime asks for something different.
Do the AML/CTF rules require copies of identity documents?
AUSTRAC says the Act does not require copies of identification documents provided as part of customer due diligence. The practice must instead keep records of what it did to identify the customer and what information was provided. AUSTRAC adds that a separate legal responsibility to copy documents can exist outside the Act. ARNECC says following its Verification of Identity Standard requires retention of copies of the identity documents sighted.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo