Title search summaries and AI confidentiality: what a conveyancer’s title note gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.
A title search tells a conveyancer who owns the land, who has lent against it and what binds it, and the summary the practice writes from it is a document staff often paste into ChatGPT or Claude to turn a dense register extract into plain English. The register itself comes from the land registry, but the summary adds what the registry does not hold: which client is buying, what the practice has noticed and what the vendor is going through. This page marks every item in a routine summary for a NSW strata lot that bears on conveyancing, AML/CTF and privacy obligations, and shows the same summary prepared on Ermos.
The title search summary
Prepared when the contract arrives and updated before settlement, so the conveyancer can confirm who is selling, what has to be discharged and whether anything on the register affects the buyers.
Title search summary
Brindle Lane Conveyancing Pty Ltd · Matter 26-0418 · Search of 30 September 2026, 9.42am · Prepared by Callum Banh
| Folio identifier | 9/SP61234, Unit 9, 28 Lyrebird Parade, Dulwich Hill NSW 22031 |
| Land | Lot 9 in Strata Plan 61234, Inner West local government area, unit entitlement 118 of 1,0005 |
| Registered proprietor | Dennis Arthur Marlowe, sole proprietor2 |
| Notation | Death of Ruth Anne Marlowe, joint proprietor, noted 2 June 2026. Survivorship applied.4 |
| Mortgage | Commonwealth Bank of Australia, dealing AX000000, registered 14 March 20193 |
| Last sale | Transferred to D. A. and R. A. Marlowe on 22 February 2011 for $596,0006 |
| Caveats, easements, restrictions | No caveats, no easements affecting the lot, no writs, no restrictions on use noted.7 |
| Practice note | Check the discharge is lodged before our clients’ transfer. Mr Marlowe is recently widowed and has asked for settlement not to be moved. Ines Hartnell acts for him.8 |
An invented title search summary. The folio identifier and dealing number are placeholders. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.
What leaves the practice
- 1The folio and the property
Ties the document to a specific lot. Title information comes from the land registry, so the folio is not secret, but the link between this lot, this practice and these buyers is.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Title data is available from the registry, but the link to this practice’s live matter is not Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 2The registered proprietor
The vendor’s name beside his address and the fact that he is selling. Personal information about a person who is not the practice’s client. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Ownership is on the register, but the vendor’s name beside a live sale is the practice’s own information Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 3The mortgagee and the dealing number
Which bank has lent against the property and the reference of its mortgage. Financial information about the vendor, and the document a payout letter will refer to. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The vendor’s lender and dealing transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 4The death notation
That a joint proprietor has died and survivorship has been applied. A bereavement attached to a named living person and an address. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A named person’s bereavement transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 5The strata plan and unit entitlement
Details of the lot as it appears in the contract pack every buyer receives. Information on its own that identifies no one.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) Details every buyer receives in the contract pack; sending them exposes little Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 6The previous sale and price
What the vendor paid in 2011. Financial history of the vendor, from which the gain on a sale can be inferred. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A sale price on the register, but tied here to a named vendor, so the answer depends on setting Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office - 7The practice’s reading of the register
That the register is clear. AUSTRAC describes the regulated service as assisting in the planning or execution of a transaction to sell, buy or transfer real estate, and whether reading the register is part of that service is for the practice’s own program to decide. The clients rely on the practice’s reading, and a model’s reading is no substitute for it.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) The practice’s own conclusion transmitted Ermos Edge The AI can misread a folio; the conveyancer must read the register entry Ermos Dominion The AI can misread a folio; the conveyancer must read the register entry - 8The practice’s note about the vendor
A comment on the vendor’s circumstances and wishes, and the name of his solicitor. A confidence passed in the course of the matter, and nothing in the title needs it. Privacy Act guide.
Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) A confidence about the vendor transmitted Ermos Edge Stays on your instance in Australia; leaves only inside a permitted excerpt, per question, to the named provider Ermos Dominion Stays on the unit in your office
What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)
- The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
- On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
- The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
- Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.
The same document on Ermos
Ermos Dominion
The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the matter file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.
Ermos Edge
Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.
| Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude) | Ermos Edge | Ermos Dominion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the document is processed | Provider servers, generally offshore on personal plans | Your instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in Australia | The unit in your office |
| Who can read it | Provider staff and systems, under policy | Your staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothing | Your staff only |
| Is it kept | On the provider’s terms | Kept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining it | Stays on the unit |
| Can it train a model | On consumer tiers, yes | No, by contract | Only your own unit learns from it, on your hardware |
Part of AI data leakage in conveyancing practices.
Common questions
Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a title search summary?
Is it safe to paste a title search summary into ChatGPT or Claude?
Does deleting the chat remove a title search summary from ChatGPT or Claude?
How can a conveyancing practice use AI for a title search summary without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
What does a title search show a conveyancer?
How long should a title search stay on the matter file?
Is work on a title part of the AML/CTF service?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo