Title search summaries and AI confidentiality: what a conveyancer’s title note gives away in ChatGPT or Claude.

A title search tells a conveyancer who owns the land, who has lent against it and what binds it, and the summary the practice writes from it is a document staff often paste into ChatGPT or Claude to turn a dense register extract into plain English. The register itself comes from the land registry, but the summary adds what the registry does not hold: which client is buying, what the practice has noticed and what the vendor is going through. This page marks every item in a routine summary for a NSW strata lot that bears on conveyancing, AML/CTF and privacy obligations, and shows the same summary prepared on Ermos.

The title search summary

Prepared when the contract arrives and updated before settlement, so the conveyancer can confirm who is selling, what has to be discharged and whether anything on the register affects the buyers.

Title search summary
Brindle Lane Conveyancing Pty Ltd · Matter 26-0418 · Search of 30 September 2026, 9.42am · Prepared by Callum Banh

Folio identifier
Land
Registered proprietor
Notation
Mortgage
Last sale
Caveats, easements, restrictions
Practice note

An invented title search summary. The folio identifier and dealing number are placeholders. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the practice

  1. 1
    The folio and the property

    Ties the document to a specific lot. Title information comes from the land registry, so the folio is not secret, but the link between this lot, this practice and these buyers is.

  2. 2
    The registered proprietor

    The vendor’s name beside his address and the fact that he is selling. Personal information about a person who is not the practice’s client. Privacy Act guide.

  3. 3
    The mortgagee and the dealing number

    Which bank has lent against the property and the reference of its mortgage. Financial information about the vendor, and the document a payout letter will refer to. Privacy Act guide.

  4. 4
    The death notation

    That a joint proprietor has died and survivorship has been applied. A bereavement attached to a named living person and an address. Privacy Act guide.

  5. 5
    The strata plan and unit entitlement

    Details of the lot as it appears in the contract pack every buyer receives. Information on its own that identifies no one.

  6. 6
    The previous sale and price

    What the vendor paid in 2011. Financial history of the vendor, from which the gain on a sale can be inferred. Privacy Act guide.

  7. 7
    The practice’s reading of the register

    That the register is clear. AUSTRAC describes the regulated service as assisting in the planning or execution of a transaction to sell, buy or transfer real estate, and whether reading the register is part of that service is for the practice’s own program to decide. The clients rely on the practice’s reading, and a model’s reading is no substitute for it.

  8. 8
    The practice’s note about the vendor

    A comment on the vendor’s circumstances and wishes, and the name of his solicitor. A confidence passed in the course of the matter, and nothing in the title needs it. Privacy Act guide.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the practice no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the matter file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in conveyancing practices.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a title search summary?
Yes, everything pasted from the summary is sent to the AI company's servers and processed there to produce a reply. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. The summary adds to the register extract the vendor's recent bereavement, his solicitor's name and the practice's note about his wishes.
Is it safe to paste a title search summary into ChatGPT or Claude?
No, because the summary adds private detail to a register extract that comes from the land registry. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks. The practice note says the vendor is recently widowed, wants settlement not to move and is acting through a named solicitor. The summary also ties one lot to one matter at this practice, and the vendor is not the practice's client.
Does deleting the chat remove a title search summary from ChatGPT or Claude?
Not entirely. Deleting a chat removes it from the user's history, but OpenAI and Anthropic each say they can keep a deleted chat on their systems for up to 30 days, and longer where safety or legal obligations apply (OpenAI, Anthropic). Both products also have memory features that can carry details from one conversation into later ones, and on a personal account each user decides whether they are switched on (ChatGPT, Claude). NSW Government guidance says records for each transaction must sit in a separate file the licensee keeps for at least seven years, so the practice needs to know where every copy of this summary is, including the pasted one.
How can a conveyancing practice use AI for a title search summary without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. The summary is drafted from the register extract and the practice's own title search template. The licensed conveyancer reads it against the register before it goes on the matter file.
What does a title search show a conveyancer?
A title search shows the registered proprietors of a lot, the mortgages registered against it, and any caveats, easements or restrictions on the folio. The conveyancer uses it to confirm that the person selling is the registered owner, to see what has to be discharged at settlement and to check that nothing on the register affects the buyers.
How long should a title search stay on the matter file?
NSW Government guidance says records for each transaction must be kept in a separate file and kept safely by the licensee for at least seven years, unless lawfully transferred to another licensee or a legal practitioner. A title search summary written for a transaction belongs on that file, so the practice should know where every copy is.
Is work on a title part of the AML/CTF service?
AUSTRAC describes the regulated service as assisting in the planning or execution of a transaction to sell, buy or transfer real estate, and says conveyancers must have an AML/CTF program before they do. Work on the title is part of acting on a transaction, so a practice should treat its title work as inside that service and check it against its own program.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo