Client letters and AI data leakage: what leaves an accounting firm when one goes into ChatGPT or Claude.

The client letter is the document most likely to be pasted into an AI tool, because it is the one most staff want help writing. It is also the one that carries the most: identity, figures, bank details, a tax file number and the firm’s own advice. This page marks every item in a routine year-end letter that the firm is obliged to keep confidential, explains the AI confidentiality and data leakage question each one raises, and shows what happens to the same letter on Ermos.

The year-end client letter

Sent to a client once the draft return is ready and before lodgment, listing the points the client has to confirm.

Northgate Partners
Chartered Accountants


Attn:

23 October 2026

Dear Daniel,

Re: 2026 income tax return and

Thank you for sending through the June quarter bank statements and the finance agreement for the new CNC router.

We have completed the draft return for Harbourline Joinery Pty Ltd (). after the instalments already paid. Before we lodge, we need you to confirm three things:

  1. ().
  2. Please confirm her matches her payment summary.

Kind regards,


An invented letter. The TFN and ABN are the ATO’s published example values. Hover or tap any highlighted item for the analysis; the full list is below.

What leaves the firm

  1. 1
    The client’s identity and address

    Personal information about an identifiable individual, which brings the Privacy Act into play, and the key that ties every other item on this page to a real business. Privacy Act guide.

  2. 2
    The ABN

    On its own, public. Alongside the rest of the letter it confirms exactly which entity the figures, the loan and the ATO matter belong to.

  3. 3
    Taxable income and tax payable

    Confidential financial information acquired in the professional relationship. APES 110 R114.2 prohibits disclosing it without a legal or professional duty or the client’s authority. APES 110 confidentiality guide.

  4. 4
    Bank account details

    A BSB and partial account number for the director’s personal account. Financial identifiers are the information most useful to a fraudster, and the least necessary for drafting a letter.

  5. 5
    The Division 7A problem

    The firm’s own advice and the client’s compliance exposure in one paragraph. This is the content the client is paying for confidentiality on, and the item most damaging if it surfaced anywhere else. TPB Code guide.

  6. 6
    A second person’s details

    The director’s spouse, named, with her income. She is a separate individual whose personal information the firm holds, and she has not been asked about any of this. Privacy Act guide.

  7. 7
    A tax file number

    The TFN Rule permits TFN information to be used or disclosed only for tax, superannuation or personal assistance law purposes, and requires access to be restricted to people who need it for those purposes. Unauthorised disclosure of a TFN can be an offence under the Taxation Administration Act 1953. Tax file numbers guide.

  8. 8
    A live ATO matter

    A notice reference, an overclaim and a recommendation to make a voluntary disclosure. Information about a regulator’s attention to a client, before the client has decided what to do. TPB Code guide.

  9. 9
    The practitioner and the firm

    The partner’s name and registration tie the whole letter back to a registered agent with statutory confidentiality obligations, and make any leak traceable to the practice. TPB Code guide.

What happens in Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)

  • The whole document is transmitted to the provider’s servers. On personal plans the user cannot choose where it is stored or processed, and for the major providers that has generally meant outside Australia, under that country’s legal process. Some business plans offer storage in Australia, but the provider still receives the content.
  • On consumer tiers, prompts can be retained and used to train future models.
  • The provider’s staff and systems can reach the content under the provider’s own policies.
  • Once sent, the firm no longer controls it. Retention and deletion happen on the provider’s terms.

The same document on Ermos

Ermos Dominion

The document is drafted on a unit in your office, from your own templates and the client file. Every marked item stays on the unit, which keeps working with the internet switched off. Nothing in it is transmitted to an AI provider, so there is no disclosure to analyse: the confidentiality work is the same as for your file server.

Ermos Edge

Your documents, the index and your access boundaries stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre. When a staff member asks for this draft, only their question and the excerpts they are permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, who is contractually barred from keeping the content or training any model on it. Nothing is processed outside Australia. Where a letter carries a tax file number, the access boundaries you set decide who can raise an excerpt containing it, and the provider keeps nothing once the answer is returned.

Frontier Models (ChatGPT, Claude)Ermos EdgeErmos Dominion
Where the document is processedProvider servers, generally offshore on personal plansYour instance in an Australian data centre; answers generated in AustraliaThe unit in your office
Who can read itProvider staff and systems, under policyYour staff, within the boundaries you set. The named Australian provider processes only permitted excerpts, under contract, and keeps nothingYour staff only
Is it keptOn the provider’s termsKept on your instance; the provider is barred from retaining itStays on the unit
Can it train a modelOn consumer tiers, yesNo, by contractOnly your own unit learns from it, on your hardware

Part of AI data leakage in accounting firms. See how this works in practice: Client letters on Ermos.

Common questions

Do ChatGPT and Claude use the information in a year-end client letter?
That depends on the account the user is on. As at October 2026, whether a conversation on a personal plan (ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro; Claude Free, Pro or Max) can be used to train the models depends on a setting each user controls. Business plans (ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, Claude Team and Enterprise) and the developer APIs sit under commercial terms, and OpenAI and Anthropic each say they do not train on that content by default (OpenAI, Anthropic). On either product, the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons can send a whole conversation back for training. The letter is also sent to the AI company to be processed. This letter holds the Division 7A advice, a tax file number and an ATO notice.
Is it safe to paste a year-end client letter into ChatGPT or Claude?
No, and tidying the letter first changes little. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends in its guidance on commercially available AI products that organisations do not enter personal information, and particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools, because of the significant and complex privacy risks. The Division 7A paragraph still records a $68,000 withdrawal and a deemed dividend risk. The taxable income and tax payable still describe one company's year. The director's wife is named with her fees, and nobody has asked her.
What if staff use their own ChatGPT or Claude account for a year-end client letter?
The practice cannot see where the letter went. On a personal plan the user cannot choose where conversations are stored or processed. Some business plans let an organisation choose to store data at rest in Australia (OpenAI), which still leaves the content with the AI company. Both companies can also review content that is flagged for safety or policy reasons. A letter sent from a personal account sits outside the practice's own records and access controls, so nobody at the practice can account for it. The practice could not tell the client where the company's taxable income and the director's bank details ended up.
How can an accounting practice use AI for a year-end client letter without sending it to ChatGPT or Claude?
Ermos is built so the document stays under your control. On the Dominion AI unit it is drafted inside your office and none of it is sent to an AI provider. On Ermos Edge your documents and index stay on your own instance in an Australian data centre, and only the question and the excerpts the user is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider that is contractually barred from keeping them or training any model on them. Ermos drafts the letter from the client file and the practice's own year-end letter template. The partner checks every figure and signs it before it goes out.
Is pasting a client letter into ChatGPT or Claude a breach?
That depends on the tool's terms and on whether the client has authorised the disclosure. APES 110 Subsection 114 prohibits disclosing confidential client information without a legal or professional duty or the client's authority, and the TPB Code requires the client's permission before information about their affairs goes to a third party. A firm needs to be able to answer that question before the tool is in use, which is what the guides linked on this page are for.
What if we remove the names first?
Redaction helps on one document and fails at scale. Figures, an ATO reference and a described transaction can identify a client on their own, and the approach depends on someone remembering every time, usually at deadline. Processing inside the practice removes the need to remember.
Does an enterprise AI subscription fix this?
It improves the contract: no training on your data by default, admin controls, shorter retention. The letter is still transmitted to and processed by a third party, for the major providers outside Australia, so the disclosure question above still has to be answered.
Does this page describe what Ermos sends out?
Yes, for both products. On Dominion the letter is drafted on a unit in your office and none of the marked items leave it. On Edge your documents stay on your own instance in Australia, and only the question and the excerpts the person asking is permitted to see go to a named Australian provider, under a contract that bars keeping or training on them.

See Dominion answering from your own documents.

A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.

Book a demo