Ermos AI for policy wording comparison.
The difference between two policies lives in wording only brokers read: a definition here, an exclusion there, a condition that swallows a promise. Reading wordings side by side is where broking expertise meets its time limit. The unit reads them all; the broker judges what matters for the client.
How it works on the unit
Insurer wordings, endorsements and your own comparison notes are indexed on the unit.
Ask how two wordings differ on a head of cover: definitions, exclusions, conditions and limits, each difference cited to the clauses.
Does this wording respond to this scenario, what does it require of the insured, where are the notification traps.
Which differences matter for this client is broking judgement. The unit guarantees the differences are all on the table.
What it changes in placement
Placements get compared on wording rather than premium alone, client advice gets specific about what a cheaper policy gives up, and your comparison knowledge compounds in the library instead of in one senior broker's memory.
Why on-premise matters here
Your annotated wordings and comparison notes are the brokerage's competitive knowledge. ErmosIQ tunes to them on the unit, and they stay yours.
Common questions
Is a wording comparison from AI reliable?
Can it compare against our standard endorsements?
Does this replace insurer comparison platforms?
See Dominion answering from your own documents.
A demonstration takes 30 minutes, uses no client data, and comes with no obligation.
Book a demo